How do PEEK and POM compare in terms of pressure resistance? Key Differences Explained

When comparing PEEK (Polyether Ether Ketone) and POM (Polyoxymethylene) in terms of pressure resistance, both materials outperform PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene) significantly. They can handle pressures of 500 bar or more for smaller bore sizes (DN6-DN25) and 450 bar or more for larger sizes (DN32-DN50). While their pressure resistance is similar, PEEK generally offers superior mechanical strength, thermal stability, and chemical resistance, making it more suitable for high-performance applications. POM, on the other hand, is more cost-effective and easier to machine, which may be preferable for less demanding environments where extreme pressure resistance isn't the sole criterion.

Key Points Explained:

1. Pressure Resistance Comparison:

   • Both PEEK and POM can withstand pressures of 500 bar or more for smaller bore sizes (DN6-DN25).
   • For larger bore sizes (DN32-DN50), both materials handle 450 bar or more.
   • This performance is superior to PTFE, which has lower pressure resistance.

2. Material Properties Influencing Pressure Resistance:

   • PEEK:
     • Higher tensile strength and rigidity, contributing to better pressure containment.
     • Excellent creep resistance, meaning it maintains structural integrity under sustained high pressure.
     • Superior thermal stability (up to 250°C), which prevents deformation under high-pressure, high-temperature conditions.
   • POM:
     • Good stiffness and strength but lower than PEEK.
     • Moderate thermal stability (up to 90-100°C), which may limit performance in high-temperature, high-pressure scenarios.
     • More prone to creep under prolonged stress compared to PEEK.

3. Application Considerations:

   • PEEK is ideal for extreme environments (e.g., oil and gas, aerospace) where high pressure, temperature, and chemical exposure are factors.
   • POM is suitable for less severe applications (e.g., automotive components, industrial machinery) where cost and machinability are prioritized over extreme performance.

4. Cost and Machinability:

   • POM is generally more affordable and easier to machine, making it a practical choice for high-volume production where extreme pressure resistance isn't critical.
   • PEEK's higher cost is justified by its exceptional performance in demanding conditions.

5. Long-Term Performance:

   • PEEK's resistance to fatigue and wear ensures reliability over time in high-pressure systems.
   • POM may require more frequent replacement in high-stress applications due to its lower fatigue resistance.

In summary, while PEEK and POM exhibit similar pressure resistance, PEEK's superior mechanical and thermal properties make it the better choice for high-performance applications. POM, however, offers a balance of performance and cost for less demanding uses. Have you considered how operating temperature might further influence your material choice in high-pressure systems? These materials quietly enable modern engineering solutions across industries, from medical devices to industrial hydraulics.

Summary Table:

Need high-performance polymer components for your application? KINTEK specializes in precision-engineered PEEK and POM solutions for industries like semiconductor, medical, and industrial hydraulics. Whether you require custom fabrication, prototypes, or high-volume orders, our expertise ensures reliability under extreme pressure and temperature conditions. Contact us today to discuss your project requirements!